
  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>BioTech Bench</title>
      <link>https://biotechbench.com/blog</link>
      <description>Where Wet Lab Meets Dry Lab — Tools, Tutorials &amp; Reviews for Modern Biologists</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <managingEditor>hello@biotechbench.com (BioTech Bench)</managingEditor>
      <webMaster>hello@biotechbench.com (BioTech Bench)</webMaster>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <atom:link href="https://biotechbench.com/tags/open-source/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
      
  <item>
    <guid>https://biotechbench.com/blog/free-open-source-alternatives-prism-snapgene-flowjo-biorender</guid>
    <title>The free wet-lab software stack: open-source replacements for GraphPad Prism, SnapGene, FlowJo, and BioRender</title>
    <link>https://biotechbench.com/blog/free-open-source-alternatives-prism-snapgene-flowjo-biorender</link>
    <description>A five-person molecular biology lab easily spends $6,000 a year on per-seat subscriptions for Prism, SnapGene, FlowJo, and BioRender. I tested the free, open-source replacements on real bench data — from 4PL IC50 curves and diagnostic digests to FCS gating — and looked honestly at where the free stack wins and where it still hurts.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <author>hello@biotechbench.com (BioTech Bench)</author>
    <category>tool-review</category><category>free-tools</category><category>open-source</category><category>R</category><category>python</category><category>molecular-biology</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://biotechbench.com/blog/opencloning-open-source-cloning-design-review</guid>
    <title>OpenCloning: the free, open-source tool that documents how your plasmid was actually built</title>
    <link>https://biotechbench.com/blog/opencloning-open-source-cloning-design-review</link>
    <description>A free, MIT-licensed web app that treats your cloning history — not just the final map — as the thing worth saving. I ran it self-hosted, cloned URA3 into pUC19 from a Python script, and looked hard at where it falls short of SnapGene and Benchling.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <author>hello@biotechbench.com (BioTech Bench)</author>
    <category>tool-review</category><category>molecular-biology</category><category>cloning</category><category>free-tools</category><category>open-source</category>
  </item>

    </channel>
  </rss>
