BioTech Bench
HomeLearning PathsCategoriesResourcesShopAbout

All Posts

Browse by topic
  • bioinformatics (33)
  • how-to (27)
  • r (20)
  • crispr (19)
  • r-series (18)
  • gene-editing (16)
  • beginner (15)
  • crispr-series (14)
  • tool-review (12)
  • intermediate (10)
  • rna-seq (10)
  • molecular-biology (7)
  • ai (4)
  • explainer (4)
  • free-tools (4)
  • learning (4)
  • sequencing (3)
  • protein-design (2)
  • trends (2)
  • ngs (2)
  • open-source (2)
  • python (2)
  • statistics (2)
  • pcr (2)
  • esm3 (1)
  • alphafold3 (1)
  • protein-structure (1)
  • bash (1)
  • command-line (1)
  • lab-software (1)
  • scientific-illustration (1)
  • conda (1)
  • synthetic-biology (1)
  • bioelectronics (1)
  • nanotechnology (1)
  • off-target (1)
  • reviewing (1)
  • bench-biologist (1)
  • nanopore (1)
  • pacbio (1)
  • cloning (1)
  • drug-discovery (1)
  • career (1)
  • biology (1)

All Posts

  • bioinformatics (33)
  • how-to (27)
  • r (20)
  • crispr (19)
  • r-series (18)
  • gene-editing (16)
  • beginner (15)
  • crispr-series (14)
  • tool-review (12)
  • intermediate (10)
  • rna-seq (10)
  • molecular-biology (7)
  • ai (4)
  • explainer (4)
  • free-tools (4)
  • learning (4)
  • sequencing (3)
  • protein-design (2)
  • trends (2)
  • ngs (2)
  • open-source (2)
  • python (2)
  • statistics (2)
  • pcr (2)
  • esm3 (1)
  • alphafold3 (1)
  • protein-structure (1)
  • bash (1)
  • command-line (1)
  • lab-software (1)
  • scientific-illustration (1)
  • conda (1)
  • synthetic-biology (1)
  • bioelectronics (1)
  • nanotechnology (1)
  • off-target (1)
  • reviewing (1)
  • bench-biologist (1)
  • nanopore (1)
  • pacbio (1)
  • cloning (1)
  • drug-discovery (1)
  • career (1)
  • biology (1)
  • DESeq2 vs edgeR: which one should you use and does it actually matter?
    Published on
    May 19, 2026

    DESeq2 vs edgeR: which one should you use and does it actually matter?

    how-toRbioinformaticsr-seriesrna-seq
    An honest head-to-head comparison of DESeq2 and edgeR. Learn the differences in their normalization, statistical tests, and run-times, and see if they actually give different biological answers.
  • Amplicon NGS for CRISPR: how to design your sequencing strategy
    Published on
    May 14, 2026

    Amplicon NGS for CRISPR: how to design your sequencing strategy

    how-tocrisprbioinformaticsngssequencing
    A practical guide to designing a cost-effective and accurate amplicon next-generation sequencing (NGS) strategy to quantify CRISPR editing efficiency and characterises indels.
  • Differential gene expression with DESeq2: a step-by-step tutorial
    Published on
    May 12, 2026

    Differential gene expression with DESeq2: a step-by-step tutorial

    how-toRbioinformaticsr-seriesrna-seq
    Run DESeq2 on a real RNA-seq experiment, start to finish: load the airway dataset, filter low counts, model paired donors, and read the results table without fooling yourself.
  • Sanger + TIDE/ICE: quantifying CRISPR editing without NGS
    Published on
    May 7, 2026

    Sanger + TIDE/ICE: quantifying CRISPR editing without NGS

    crispr-seriescrisprgene-editingbeginnerhow-to
    T7E1 tells you if CRISPR worked. TIDE and ICE tell you how well. This post explains how both tools deconvolve your Sanger sequencing trace into a real editing percentage — no NGS required.
  • Understanding RNA-seq data: what those count matrices actually mean
    Published on
    May 5, 2026

    Understanding RNA-seq data: what those count matrices actually mean

    explainerRbioinformaticsr-seriesrna-seqbeginner
    Before you run DESeq2, you need to understand what those numbers in your count matrix actually represent. This post explains what RNA-seq count data is, why raw counts are misleading, and exactly what format DESeq2 expects.
Previous4 of 11Next
mailMail
Support us on Ko-fi
BioTech Bench
•
© 2026
About & Editorial Standards·Resources·Sponsor·Privacy Policy
Made with ❤️love and ☕